That was frustrating as hell to watch.

I'm really annoyed that I saw Harold perform a few good moves in certain instances, and then I started to wonder why he didn't employ them constantly. If he'd done that, he'd probably had a bunch more sacks. But he didn't. Which is most likely why he "only" experienced about 7.5 total sacks in College Football 25 Coins the season. It's not a bad one, but it certainly isn't a great one either.

Perhaps it would have helped If he hadn't missed so many tackles. He also missed some sacks. In the Louisville game alone, in a game that he scored two sacks, the player completely missed three other tackles, one of which could have been a sack. The dude should be a skilled athlete , but if the dude is scot-free, he fails to succeed in making the play?

That's worrying.

I'm not even close to discussing Harold's less than stellar performance against the run. I'm willing to admit that every occasionally, he stepped off the ball in a good way and then threw the blocker up and played the ball. In the majority of cases, however, he got struck in the back or manhandled.

No bueno.

Harold also gave up the edge to running backs on running plays wayyyyy too often during the five games, and that doesn't make sense. I know he's a little weak in the back however, his blocking skills will be much better when he gets to an up-level. The player will need come up with a solution to repair that shit in a hurry. A bit of extra weight, some squats , and an improved technique would be my recommendation, but for today, I'm imagining Harold trying to gain an edge to College Football 25 level offensive tackles and tight ends is not a nice sight.

To be fair, there were instances where Harold was able to make some spectacular runs. It's just that I'm used to hearing that from top players. It's not just only once or twice that amazes me. It's the consistency of doing it playing play after play that can make me feel excited. Harold displayed his skills in every play against both the passing and against the run. But you could also watch any play in those five games in which he looked like an ordinary player.

This isn't a good thing.

The good thing is that Eli Harold is all of the issues I've had with him are fixable. He has a decent set of move to pass rush but he needs to employ them more. He has demonstrated that he can do a decent job against the run; he just needs to learn to be better and more consistent with his methods. As he grows larger and stronger in the College Football 25. that can help in the two areas. He certainly is physically fit enough to play an outside linebacker in a 3-4-5 and is also ideal defensive end , so his flexibility will also help him.

The bad news is that he's still not ready to be a starter right currently and might not be ready for a year or so. It will take some time to build up the mass and strength he'll need to be a good player in College Football 25. It'll also require some time to make better at his technique and to play more consistently. Eventually he is probably going be a great player however, the team that decides to take him in will need to be patient.

It sounds great, but most teams do not take an unproven quarterback high in the draft, unless they expect him to play right away. I know that "everyone" has edge rushers, and it could be possible to get some competition at the beginning of the draft, however I'd still be cautious about taking Harold at this level. Even, I'd be nervous about taking him in the second round just to be honest with you. He's got a lot of work to complete and if I'm on a team that needs urgent help from a pass rusher I'm not sure Harold is the right choice. I was hoping to like Harold as a Buy CFB 25 Coins player more however, I don't see it.